遵循以下最佳实践的项目将能够自愿的自我认证,并显示他们已经实现了核心基础设施计划(OpenSSF)徽章。 显示详细资料
[](https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/2519)
<a href="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/2519"><img src="https://www.bestpractices.dev/projects/2519/badge"></a>
A collection of Miles B Huff's GNU/Linux configuration files.
This is a personal dotfiles repository, so a contribution guide isn't strictly necessary.
It's a single-person personal dofiles repository, and is hardly in-need of an explicit legal framework.
It's a single-person personal dofiles repository, and is hardly in-need of an explicit legal framework. In fact, codes of conduct don't belong in most software projects, just in general.
It's a single-person personal dofiles repository. If I die, the project will die -- that's just how that works.
It's a single-person personal dofiles repository, and is hardly in-need of a year-long roadmap.
It's a dotfiles repository. Such a thing contains code that is far too disparate to provide some sort of encompassing high-level design.
It's a single-person personal dofiles repository, and is provided without warranty or any guarantee of support.
If you don't know how to "install" a bunch of dotfiles, countless walkthroughs are readily available elsewhere online.
The in-file documentation is almost always updated alongside the code it describes.
It would be a bit presumptuous to parade a CII badge around on a dotfiles project.
Dotfiles as a format are barely capable of any semblance of accessibility.
These dotfiles are English-only.
These dotfiles do not themselves cache any passwords.
This being a personal dotfile collection, it does not have releases or versions.
https://github.com/MilesBHuff/Dotfiles/issues
No vulnerability reports to speak of.
Personal dotfiles projects don't need such things.
Dotfiles don't generally require test suites, and these are no exception.
Shell scripts are interpreted, not compiled.
None of those have been enabled in the configuration.
Weirdly, it the Wikipedia page doesn't seem to have any static analyzers for bash. The closest one is Apache Yetus, but afaict it doesn't seem to actually check the shell code itself.
Shell scripts should be too high-level to be memory-unsafe.
后退